Reference review
Turn successful proofs into structured review criteria.
High-converting videos are hard to emulate. FrameGrade turns uploaded references into direct comparison scorecards, so creators know exactly what to match before approval.
Reference mechanism
Approved example into review criteria
The reference becomes a reusable path from shared standard to concrete fixes and a clearer decision.
Reference checks
Reference structure is present.
Revision notes become specific.
Approved example
Shared standard
Criteria extracted
Checks made visible
Creator submission
New video reviewed
Match / fixes
Pass and fix areas
Decision ready
Next step is clear
Reference structure is present.
Revision notes become specific.
Reference mechanism
Approved example to clearer review.
Approved example
Start from a reference that shows the creative pattern reviewers want to preserve.
Review criteria
Turn structure, product moments, captions, pacing, and required talking points into checks.
Creator submission
Compare the next upload against the same shared reference and campaign standards.
Matches, fixes, and decision support
Separate what matches from what needs revision without guessing from taste alone.
Reference criteria
From reference to review criteria.
An approved example gives reviewers more than inspiration. FrameGrade helps turn the parts of that example into concrete review checks for the next creator submission.
Approved example
The reference becomes a shared standard for review.
Instead of asking reviewers to judge whether a submission "feels close," the reference can become a set of visible checks around structure, sequence, captions, pacing, and execution.
What gets carried forward
Creative structure
The opening angle, sequence, and pacing become reviewable patterns.
Product moments
Key reveals, use cases, and proof points stay visible during review.
Message requirements
Claims, captions, CTA, and talking points become easier to check.
Execution standard
Reviewers compare the next submission against the same shared reference.
Hook structure
The opening angle, first beat, and setup become checks reviewers can compare against.
Product sequence
FrameGrade can keep the expected order of reveal, use, benefit, and proof visible during review.
CTA clarity
The reference sets expectations for when the CTA appears and how clearly it is delivered.
Captions
Caption placement, readability, and message support become part of the review criteria.
Pacing & style
Timing, tone, cuts, and presentation style are checked as execution patterns, not guesses.
Script adherence
Checks whether required talking points, claims, or scripted moments are followed closely enough for the campaign.
Decision path
From review criteria to informed decisions.
The goal is not to copy a reference perfectly. The goal is to make the review path clearer: turn the example into criteria, compare the submission, return fixes, and support the final decision.
Upload reference
Start with an approved example that shows the creative pattern reviewers want to preserve.
Set criteria
Translate that reference into campaign checks for hook, sequence, CTA, captions, pacing, and style.
Review submissions
Compare each creator upload against the selected reference criteria before approval.
Return fixes
Turn missed reference criteria into specific revision notes a creator can act on.
Approve or request changes
Use the comparison to support the final review decision without guessing from taste alone.
Make references easier to recreate.
Use reference review to compare submissions, clarify what needs to change, and turn examples into concrete campaign criteria.
Turn approved examples into repeatable review.
Use references to make criteria, fixes, and final review decisions easier to explain.