Human override
Authorized users can change an automated decision when campaign context calls for judgment.
Autonomy & controls
Autonomous decisions. Your standards.
FrameGrade reviews creator submissions automatically using the campaign rules and thresholds you configure. Every outcome stays connected to its evidence and decision history, so your team keeps control without performing every first-pass review.
How to review UGC creator contentSummer Launch · Decision policy
Customer configuration governs the outcome
Campaign standards
What must be true
Required rules5 checks
Approve at7 / 10
Reference reviewEnabled
Outcomes3 permitted
Submission evaluation
Rules evaluated
Evidence matched to policy
4 of 5 passedResolved
Configured outcome
Approved
Revision requested
Rejected
Define the decision policy
Define what happens before submissions arrive.
A campaign carries the requirements, review mode, thresholds, and reference context that FrameGrade uses during evaluation. The automated decision follows that configuration rather than a hidden default.
Campaign settings
Summer Launch
Decision configuration
Approval modeAutomated review
Approve at7 or higher
Below thresholdRevision or rejection
Evaluation context
Campaign requirements5 active
Reference criteriaEnabled
Creator guidanceAttached
Settings remain campaign-specific, so a product launch and a testimonial campaign do not have to share the same decision policy.
Explainable autonomy
Evidence becomes a rule result before it becomes a decision.
The review record keeps the detected evidence, evaluated campaign rules, and configured outcome connected. Autonomous does not mean opaque.
summer_launch_v3.mp4
Campaign · Summer Launch
Evidence
Signals retained
Product detected0:06
Caption issue0:14–0:18
CTA detected0:28
Rule evaluation
Campaign standard applied
Product before 0:10Pass
Music ≤ −14 LUFSPass
Captions: 1 line maxFail
CTA requiredPass
Decision
Configured result
Revision requested
Caption formatting exceeded the campaign’s one-line maximum.
- Decision source
- Automated
- Evidence retained
- Yes
Control when needed
Autonomous by default. Controllable when needed.
Teams define the boundaries around autonomous review and retain targeted controls without turning every submission back into a manual queue.
Role-based access
Workspace roles govern who can review submissions, modify decisions, and manage campaign settings.
Campaign-specific standards
Each campaign can carry its own requirements, thresholds, references, and decision policy.
Configured routing
Hybrid campaigns can route borderline or flagged submissions to reviewer attention when configured.
Need a different operating model?
Campaigns can also use human-led review or hybrid routing. Those settings remain available when a team wants reviewer decisions or configured reviewer attention instead of fully autonomous outcomes.
Decision history
Every decision leaves a record.
Keep the submission, evidence, review result, decision source, and revision path connected. When an authorized user overrides a decision, that change can remain part of the operational history.
Explainable results Connected revisions
Decision record
Summer Launch · Avery R.
- 4:42 PM
Submission received
summer_launch_v3.mp4 · Revision 1
- 4:43 PM
Autonomous review completed
4 of 5 campaign rules passed
- 4:43 PM
Revision requested
Decision source · Automated
- Next step
Creator correction available
Caption formatting must use one line
Get started
Ready to automate creator review?
Set the standards and decision policy. Let FrameGrade handle the first pass.
- No credit card required
- Sign up for free